by Université catholique de Louvain
Treatment options for a deadly liver
cancer, fibrolamellar carcinoma, are severely lacking. Drugs that work on other
liver cancers are not effective, and although progress has been made in
identifying the specific genes involved in driving the growth of fibrolamellar
tumors, these findings have yet to translate into any treatment. For now,
surgery is the only option for those affected—mostly children and young adults
with no prior liver conditions.
Sanford M. Simon and his group understood
that patients dying of fibrolamellar could not afford to wait. "There are
people who need therapy now," he says. So his group threw the kitchen sink
at the problem and tested over 5,000 compounds, either already approved for
other clinical uses or in clinical trials, to see whether any of the compounds
could be repurposed to treat fibrolamellar. The team ultimately discovered a
few classes of therapeutics that destroy fibrolamellar tumor cells growing in
mice. Their findings are published in Cancer Discovery.
"We decided to be completely agnostic
about what we thought would work—we tried everything," says Simon, head of
the Laboratory of Cellular Biophysics. "To our surprise, we found a few
compounds that work really well."
Faster
drug discovery
In an ideal world, scientists perform
extensive experiments to identify the perfect therapeutic target for a disease,
then test a suite of drugs in model systems to pinpoint promising treatment
options to hit the chosen target. The Simon lab is undergoing such experiments,
but this process can take years, and the children and young adults who are sick
now of fibrolamellar will likely never see the fruits of such labors.
So Simon took a parallel, expedited
approach. After testing an extensive library of drugs on fibrolamellar tumor
cells grown in mice over the course of several months, his team identified a
few novel classes of therapeutics that appear to effectively kill fibrolamellar
tumor cells, and further experiments provided some molecular explanations for
why these drugs are so effective against a disease that has, until now, baffled
physicians who treat liver cancer.
"Up to this point I've had to tell
patients that we don't have any medicines that are proven to work," says
Michael V. Ortiz, a pediatric oncologist at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center and a collaborator on the study. "It's really thrilling that we
finally have some promising drugs to go after in clinical trials. And, since
each individual responds differently, it's particularly exciting that we had
multiple hits, which we can now test in combination with one another."
Treatment
tailored for one
Building on these initial findings, Simon
and his colleagues tested the compounds on human cells taken directly from
patient tumors. They were able to test the cells against their lineup of drug
candidates after growing them for only a few days, obtaining results similar to
those observed in cells that took months to grow.
"Within three days, we can have
therapeutically informative data, which is much faster than previous methods
allowed," says Gadi Lalazar, an instructor in clinical investigation in
the Simon laboratory and first author on the study. "Although there are
some logistical hurdles and additional verification is needed, this could
potentially be transformative for treating certain cancers."
The findings suggest that it may be
unnecessary to screen new cancer drug candidates in cells grown in mice before
testing them on human cells—an extra step that can cost cancer researchers many
months. Given these results, physicians may soon be able to biopsy cells from a
patient's tumor, subject those cells to a bevy of drug candidates until they
find the most effective compound for that specific patient, and have a
treatment plan ready in a matter of days—potentially transforming the landscape
of precision medicine.
Advances
in precision medicine
Simon's recent work was inspired by the
2015 precision medicine initiative begun in the Obama administration, which
promised to change the face of medicine with a targeted approach, tailored to a
patient's unique genetic composition, lifestyle, and environment.
"You don't want to give everyone with
a limp the same treatment—you want it 'precisely targeted' based on whether
they have twisted their ankle, broken a bone, or just have a splinter,"
says Simon.
Over the past six years, Simon has
developed a series of model systems to help identify molecules known to drive
cancers, known as oncogenes. But the key to applying precision medicine to
cancer, Simon realized, is not blindly testing drugs against mutations or abnormally
expressed genes—it's performing functional screenings that ask what drugs
actually have an impact on the tumor in question.
The results of Simon's approach have now
yielded the first therapeutics shown to eliminate fibrolamellar tumor cells,
and new hope for people suffering from a deadly disease.